A new era in college football begins with the arrival of the 12-team College Football Playoff. Instead of just four of the 25 teams in the College Football Playoff Rankings being featured, almost half of them will earn a berth in the field. The first CFP Rankings will not be released until Tuesday, Nov. 5 this season, but I do not want to wait that long. I am here to predict what the top 25 would look like if the CFP Selection Committee were making its announcement this week.
The top five-ranked conference champions automatically earn a CFP berth with the top four receiving first-round byes. The top seven remaining teams in the rankings will be slotted accordingly as at-large teams.
Before we get going, here are some of the criteria considered by the CFP besides a team’s record:
- Conference championships
- Head-to-head
- Strength of schedule
- Games against common opponents
- Results against ranked opponents
Thankfully, the committee’s definition of “ranked opponents” is different than the one you are used to hearing. The rankings used for that standard are the previous week’s CFP Rankings. They don’t use rankings at the time the game was played from their own rankings or any other poll.
In fact, the committee specifically forbids the use of any poll that has a preseason starting point, which excludes the AP Top 25 and Coaches Poll. Not only do they not try to mimic those polls, they do not even use them.
Trying to sort out strength of schedule is going to be more of a chore for the committee this season than in the past. Oh, sure, they will have a SOS metric to use, but getting into the details may cause some headaches. Now that the four major conferences each have 16 or more teams, you have teams playing widely diverse schedules within the conference.
For example, in the SEC, Ole Miss is playing Georgia at home and at LSU, a game which it has already lost. It is possible that none of the other conference teams on their schedule finish the season with more than seven total wins. Meanwhile, Georgia has a schedule that has trips to Ole Miss, Texas and Alabama and a home game with Tennessee.
Notice also that “game control” is not listed among the criteria. It never has been, but that term comes out of the mouth of the committee chairman pretty regularly when talking about why a team is ranked where it is. Even if the chairman is not using that term specifically, he finds other ways to describe it.
Also, while scoring margin is not specifically a factor, the committee likes dominance, which is also a result of game control.
In the end, this is a subjective process guided by some objective data. There are 13 committee members and each may value the data points differently than their colleagues.
With all that in mind, here is what I think the rankings would look like this week. It is top heavy with SEC and Big Ten teams, but that is just where the power is in college football. Get used to it because the gap will more likely get bigger over time.
References to “rankings” refer to this week’s AP Top 25, but that is just for curiosity; I am not using it to evaluate the teams. Once the CFP Rankings are released, I will be using those for reference going forward.
Note: This projection is based only on results to this point. It does not reflect the final forecast for the playoff. The complete bowl playoff and bowl projections through the end of the season can be found here.
College Football Playoff Rankings prediction
First five out (alphabetical order): Arkansas, Army, Colorado, Memphis, Syracuse
Read the full article here
Discussion about this post